Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Mugs - scientifically, like.



There clearly isn't
an optimum shape for a mug. Otherwise we'd have found it by now.
But...







...there must be a
shape which makes sure that the tea (or other hot beverage, take your pick - for
the purposes of this discussion let's assume it's tea) (Earl Grey - in fact,
let's assume it's Green Earl Grey because I haven't had any in a while and I
miss it). (Mmmm).







Where was I? Oh
yeah.







There must be a mug
shape which first cools the tea quickly, then keeps it drinkable for the longest
period of time. Let's make some assumptions (yay! I like this
bit):




1. There is a range
of 'drinkable' temperature - say, 45-30 degrees celsius. Below this, tea is
tepid and nobody wants to drink it. Above it, the tea is too
hot.




2. People's rate of
drinking is related to temperature. Let's assume they drink it fastest at about
40 degrees.




3. Let's assume that
the profile is not allowed to 'bottleneck' - for the purposes of cleaning, the
mug isn't allowed to narrow at the top. Actually, that's a bit harsh - I have
several mugs at home which do just that. But it makes the maths trickier - is
there reflected heat from the insides? - but I guess we'll have to allow it.
Okay. But only a little bit. Great. Now we're going to need a computer to work
this out. Sheesh.




4. Also for the
purposes of practicality, the mug isn't allowed to narrow down to less than an
inch in diameter.




5. But it can be as
tall as you like (you can take practicality too far, you
know).







So the aim of the
game is to keep the temperature of the tea within the drinkable range until it's
all drunk. Now, I reckon it should go something like this: the top should be
flared, like a trumpet. That way, you start off with a big surface area and the
tea will cool quickly. Then, assuming that the drinker starts to sip it while
it's still technically too hot, the mug should narrow down fairly quickly to the
point where the tea is now at the top edge of the drinkable range. Then, the
belly of the mug can maybe open out (just a bit)... although that will increase
the surface area so it might increase the cooling rate (damn), so maybe better
to just go vertically down... until we reach the bottom, when the tea could be
nearing the bottom range of 'drinkable', when the surface should start blending
in to a nice, curvy bottom.




It's possible that
the best shape might involve having a mug that as narrow as possible, so we'll
end up with something like a trumpet balanced on a straw... but hey. It'd be a
fun investigation, anyway. Anyone know any students looking for a project?
There's plenty to do. Yo'd have to find out about the drinkable range. Then
measure people's rates of consumption at different temperatures. Then there's
some juicy simulation work to determine the reflected heat (if you're going to
include narrowing at the top - otherwise you could probably get away without
it). Choice of materials, colours, etc. Finally a bit of design work to pretty
it up a bit.




What fun... for
someone else!



(PS Denby make my favourite mugs - see below!)








19 comments:

Matt Worldgineer said...

You'd better take into account heat loss through the mug. This becomes very important for your tall cylinder mode. There are also some interesting effects from the thermal mass of the mug - how much heat it absorbs initially, the heat lost while it's being sipped, etc. I suspect the best solution to this problem is to have a lot of thermal mass, so that the temperature will drop fairly rapidly as heat is absorbed in the mass, then stay an almost constant temperature. Heat would be returned to the liquid as it cools.

Actually, this sounds familiar (link). I have an idea of a commercial product based on this, if I ever get the time/money/motivation to persue it.

Matt F said...

I know of a couple of commercial products on the theme of electrically heated mugs - this USB one and this 12V one

Good point about the thermal mass, though - that's an approach I hadn't considered. Insulated mugs just don't cut it - they keep the tea too hot, and all the proteins in the milk uncurl and make it taste funny. And yeah, the ratio of heat loss through the material compared to heat loss through the surface is what makes me think there must be an ideal shape...

Matt Worldgineer said...

I agree. The problem isn't even a very hard one, if you remove the act of sipping (which can seriously blow the math). Were I a student with extra time I'd certainly be in. Ah, the good old days of multicriteria optimization. I had a professor that worked out the optimal shape of a chicken egg - matched the real thing perfectly (well, as perfectly as you can reasonably measure an average egg).

TARA W said...

I like that mug...The color, the shape...the interior...Everything.

Matt F said...

Yeah, me too... I guess some that might argue that to really embody the essence of mugness, it needs to have a faux-humorous message on the outside (World's Best Mug Thief, or You Don't Have to Be Mad To Work Here, But If You're Sane, Why Are You Here?)... but I reckon if Plato had a mug in his cave, it would have been that one.

Tom Kimber said...

I'm not sure whether it casts quite the right shadow to go into Plato's cave, it might get mistaken for a milk jug or something. But, when I eventually get round to buying mugs myself - I will swing by Denby, because that does look like a nice trade off between size and sippability. The problem with your average mug is that the lip at the top is too thick, and enjoyment of sipping the beverage is lost because you have less control over how much hot liquid is delivered to the lip-area. A nicely fashioned china tea-cup style lip is required to allow the imbiber to effectively control the rate of liquid delivery, and, if necessary, allow some air intake (otherwise known as slurpage) to cool down any over-hot intake. This mug looks as though it provides both the volume required for a really hearty cup of tea or coffee, yet retains the delicacy of the regency tea-cup, providing the control necessary to really enjoy said cup. Plato would agree, I'm sure.

XXXX YYYY said...

I used to have a sugar & cream set like the blue mug up there but they broke. Yes, I'm clumsy.

XXXX YYYY said...

Nice shape but I think I'd prefer it in black with maybe a bit of gold trim.

TARA W said...

Hmm..I like that word. That at "slurpage". Good words!

Henry Bloomfield said...

Because my wife's a potter we collect mugs, as they're a reasonably cheap way to get examples of even very well-known potters' work. So, we have, I think, about 10 mugs, all of which are hand-thrown (I have a picture, which I'll try and remember to post). Only one (a Laurence McGowan mug) has any decoration - the others are all glazed or salt-fired stoneware or porcelain. There's a wide range of shapes and it's nice to fit the mug-type to your drink - so a Joanna Howells mug (above) is nice for a tall coffee, but not for a herbal tea, for example. Also important is the texture of the mug in the hand and the coordination of the colour of the mug to the beverage...

- H

Tom Kimber said...

That's a point - I much prefer tea in a wider cup/mug than I do coffee. I don't know why that is though.

Matt F said...

That's an interesting point. I never really considered it before, but certainly I prefer herbal teas in a bigger mug than yer standard ones. Interesting!

XXXX YYYY said...

I thought I'd like to get some beakers from a well-known local potter. I was surprised to find a set of 5 retailed for $25,000.

I had no idea she was quite that popular.

Henry Bloomfield said...

who was that? Gwynn Hansen Piggott?

Matt F said...

The only famous potter I can think of is Beatrix.

TARA W said...

And don't forget Harry.

XXXX YYYY said...

Yes, it was, Henry. She lives here in Brisbane. I guess I arrived a bit late to start collecting her stuff.

Having said that... it is beautifully sensuous design, in the most gorgeous celadon glazes. There's a clear depth to her porcelains that makes you feel you could just sink into them, like clouds.

Henry Bloomfield said...

How about Gareth Mason? - he does lovely celadon porcelain stuff, and it isn't too expensive yet.My wife only throws in porcelain too (website) but doesn't use so much celadon glaze.

XXXX YYYY said...

I'll look him up. I'm not a collector, as I already have enough obsessions in that regard. It may be nice to get a few pieces.

Celadon is selling, everywhere on Earth, at the moment.