Thursday, March 23, 2006

The Great Jaffa Cake Cake-off



Introduction


While I was in the
supermarket the other day, I noticed that Mcvities, that great purveyor of the
English biscuit, have introduced several new flavours of the renowned Jaffa
Cake. In addition to the original orange, there is now Lemon and Lime, and
Blackcurrant. I resolved to test these new flavours, and also to determine
whether there was any difference between the supermarket own-brand Jaffa Cakes,
and Mcvities originals.









Method


First, Jaffa Cakes
were purchased from a Sainsbury's supermarket I went past on the way home.
Flavours purchased were: Sainsbury's basics Jaffa Cakes (orange flavour,
obviously), Mcvities orange, lemon and lime, and ribenaberry*. These were then
displayed, and test subjects (everyone at my work) were invited to sample them
and were asked:


1. Compared to the
smashing orangey bit, how smashing is the lemon and limey bit? Or the
ribenaberry bit?


2. What's the
difference between the Sainsbury's value and the original orange
ones?







Apparatus


Jaffa Cakes. (NB
this test did not include the rumoured milk chocolate Jaffa Cake, as these are
an offence against nature).


Plates.


Cups of tea (or
coffee).







Results


Answers to the above
questions varied. On the question of smashingness, reaction to the two new
flavours was muted. Pretty much everyone preferred the original (which
incidentally has an extra calorie per cake - make of that what you will). The
lemon and lime scored well, but the blackcurrant was not considered a success.
However, what was interesting was that the first box to be finished was the
blackcurrant flavour. Hmmm...






On the question of
the difference between the Sainsbury's value and the Mcvities original, almost
everyone agreed that the inside of the cake was a different colour. Most people
could not detect a difference in overall taste, although a few claimed to prefer
the original, and one person preferred the Sainsbury's. This may have been out
of confusion, however, as some joker mixed up the packs early on in the
experiment (he knows who he is, and everybody else does, too, don't they,
Keith). The Sainsbury's 'basics' cakes were noted
to have marginally less smashing orangey bit (SOB), but the smashingness of the
orangey bit was considered comparable to the Mcvities SOB.
When the
components were nibbled off individually, the Mcvities cake was considered
superior, while the SOB in each cake was considered identical, as was the
chocolate.







Discussion


I'm really liking
the BBC's theme tune for their Commonwealth Games coverage. It's imbecilically
simple, but I like it. It gets me all excited whenever I hear it (probably
shouldn't tell you that).







Conclusion


Considering that
Sainsbury's basics Jaffa Cakes are half the price, you certainly get more
smashingness to the pound. However, the authors of this paper suggest that there
is a Law of Diminishing Marginal Smashiness, since prolonged exposure to
Sainsbury's jaffa cakes did appear to increase the subject's appreciation for
the Mcvities ones.


Don't bother with
the blackcurrant ones, either. I ate a whole one without ever realizing what
flavour it was.









Oh my God! I went to
the nicecupofteaandasitdown.com website looking for a diagram of a Jaffa Cake,
and what do I find? They've just done their own review! Love those Bahlsen
Messino ones, by the way. Didn't have 'em in Sainsburys, but they are very
scrummy.









*For those unaware
of the Ribenaberry's taxonomy, in the Linnaean system you will find it as
follows: Kingdom Fantastico, Phylum Anthropomorphica, Order Cutesi, Family
Advertisa, Genus Ribena, Species Ribenaberry. There may be subspecies. I'm
pretty sure that's it, but my Linnaean isn't really very good. I don't even know
where Linnaea is.





26 comments:

Chris G said...

funnily enough, an advert running at the moment boasts that 95% of the nations blackcurrants go into Ribena and I keep thinking - how greedy is that!

wonder where McVities get theirs.

Catriona Fisher said...

Excellent experiment - I can't fault your methodology.

While we're on the subject of meddling with masterpieces:

What about this?

See? There's just no excuse, is there?

PS: Chris, it must be true about the Ribena berries, cos David Bellamy said so!

Peter Sealy said...

They've been doing raspberry flavored Jaffa cakes over here for years. (They don't call them Jaffa cakes, though.)

John Bush said...

Catriona - I don't care what Calum may say about the peanut butter Kitkat *shudder*... but it is an abomination.

I've had raspberry ones too, in France. They weren't Jaffa cakes, but very similar.

Jonathan Phillips said...

worse. I think they're the very nadir of confectionery evil. The chocolate and wafer is truely sullied and dirtied by the additional of peanut butter. Imagine the clagginess and Munch-like horror of the peanut butter when you were expecting the blissful joy of chocolate.

Some Swiss bastard who works for Nestle is responsible for this evil and he must be punished. Frankly, if Calum even thinks these are rate as high as 'passable', then I must question his tastebuds. Individually. With a red-hot poker.

Jonathan Phillips said...

Matt - excellent research. I'm rather looking forward to your treatise on Custard Creams.

TARA W said...

Somebody messed with KitKats? ARgh. Someone over here messed with the already perfect Reece's Peanut Butter Cups. Now they have all sorts of mutations and put carmel inside the cups. Now I'm a fan of carmel, folks, but you shouldn't mess with Reece's.

TARA W said...

I liked your experiment, Matt! So what if they did their own review, yours was more in depth I think. Plus you had a consumer research group.

When I was in college I had to do an instructional speech with a visual aid on any topic I wanted. I decided that, since many people eat Oreo cookies differently, I would research that and provide a step-by-step instruction (including milk and the Oreo cookies) on how to eat an Oreo cookie the correct way. It was a very fun experiment.

Barry Owen said...

This is all wrong, people. A Jaffa Cake is a Jaffa Cake. A KitKat is a KitKat. I second JinBish.

ABOMINATION!

XXXX YYYY said...

Look out Tara, Corylus (Hazel) has some rather strong opinions re: American Chocolate particularly Hersheys'. You'd think the Limeys invented the stuff. :-P

XXXX YYYY said...

Hazel's right about Hershey's. It sucks.

John Bush said...

Too right it does. It's all sugar and tar.

Jonathan Phillips said...

There's a rule in my office which decrees that anyone who goes abroad on business must bring back some chocolate by way of a peace offering for those left behind.

Practically every week then, there's some new chocolate to sample, mostly from Europe. It's all rather lovely. We're particular favourites of the chocolatiers of Belgium.

There is a veto on the rule when it comes to travel in the US - I'm afraid we've yet to find good chocolate there that suits the palate. Much of that is due to the temperatures - it's generally warmer in the US than Northern Europe therefore the chocolate is formulated differently so that it doesn't melt. That also means that it doesn't quite melt in the mouth like European chocs.

Hershey's is particularly awful. Tastes like sick.

TARA W said...

Uh oh.. (ducks down)..Don't hit me Corylus! :)

Matt F said...

Is there a correct way to eat Oreos, Tara?

Henry Bloomfield said...

You don't like Hershey's chocolate because it's made with sour milk - it's an acquired taste apparantly.

- H

Henry Bloomfield said...

There are instructionss on the side of the packet

- H

Matt F said...

On how to eat it?

Put it this way - is there a wrong way? Can Oreos actively do harm if eaten incorrectly? "Warning: do not ingest nasally." And - my God - they've been selling custard creams for years without any sort of guidance. I could've been killed!

TARA W said...

There is a correct way. You take the cookie, twist it apart, lick the stuff on the inside, put it back together, dunk it in milk and eat it. Without those steps, you might as well throw the cookies away because they're toxic. Every other way is wrong.

Matt F said...

Why do I get the feeling that's not what it says on the packet?

"put it back together"... but how does it stick?

Henry Bloomfield said...

Seriously, there are step-by-step diagrams on the side of the packet. If I had a packet (note - in the UK Sainsbury's sells Oreo cookies) I'd post a scan

- H

TARA W said...

That's why licking the filling on the inside is crucial. By licking it you create a bond that holds the cookie together while you dunk it in milk.

Matt F said...

Mind you, there are instructions on the side of the toothpick packets. It's true - I looked. Talk about information overload. Brains and information are like tea and biscuits - dunking is very important, but there's an optimum degree of immersion.

TARA W said...

That's very true. Boundaries, people. Boundaries. :)

Andrew C said...

Beautifully written up. 8/10*

//I'm really liking// - Sorry, that phrase upsets me. It is a terminology I cannot hear - Like the knights of Ni! It makes me think too many people have fallen for a certain purveyor of burgers' ad campaign. It's a worry when I hear BBC kids TV presenters say it. - I probably shouldn't have said this, as more people might pay attention to ads now. Sorry.

"Ribena", I heard - Ribes nigrum - the botanical name for the blackcurrant.

XXXX YYYY said...

I prefer European or South American chocolate myself, but See's Candies has really good chocolate, if you're looking for good US choco. They don't have stores everywhere, they're mainly in the western states (they have a locations list on the website). They have a box called Nuts and Chews that's really great. I could probably eat the whole box (it's that good!) but I'd end up looking like Peter's girlfriend in the red bikini that he posted.

Groan...this it definitely not the thing to be talking about on an empty stomach.